mac80211: clean up some comments
Some comments refer to 80211.o or similar; also remove a comment about implementing fragments better, we really have better things to do. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
John W. Linville
parent
c2b13452b2
commit
ccd7b36286
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static __le16 ieee80211_duration(struct ieee80211_tx_data *tx, int group_addr,
|
||||
hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)tx->skb->data;
|
||||
if (ieee80211_is_ctl(hdr->frame_control)) {
|
||||
/* TODO: These control frames are not currently sent by
|
||||
* 80211.o, but should they be implemented, this function
|
||||
* mac80211, but should they be implemented, this function
|
||||
* needs to be updated to support duration field calculation.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* RTS: time needed to transmit pending data/mgmt frame plus
|
||||
@@ -1580,19 +1580,6 @@ int ieee80211_subif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
nh_pos -= skip_header_bytes;
|
||||
h_pos -= skip_header_bytes;
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO: implement support for fragments so that there is no need to
|
||||
* reallocate and copy payload; it might be enough to support one
|
||||
* extra fragment that would be copied in the beginning of the frame
|
||||
* data.. anyway, it would be nice to include this into skb structure
|
||||
* somehow
|
||||
*
|
||||
* There are few options for this:
|
||||
* use skb->cb as an extra space for 802.11 header
|
||||
* allocate new buffer if not enough headroom
|
||||
* make sure that there is enough headroom in every skb by increasing
|
||||
* build in headroom in __dev_alloc_skb() (linux/skbuff.h) and
|
||||
* alloc_skb() (net/core/skbuff.c)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
head_need = hdrlen + encaps_len + meshhdrlen - skb_headroom(skb);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user