Files
ubports_kernel_google_msm/kernel
Peter Zijlstra cd29fe6f26 sched: Sanitize fork() handling
Currently we try to do task placement in wake_up_new_task() after we do
the load-balance pass in sched_fork(). This yields complicated semantics
in that we have to deal with tasks on different RQs and the
set_task_cpu() calls in copy_process() and sched_fork()

Rename ->task_new() to ->task_fork() and call it from sched_fork()
before the balancing, this gives the policy a clear point to place the
task.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09 10:03:05 +01:00
..
2009-09-21 14:29:21 +02:00
2009-06-24 00:02:38 -04:00
2009-10-29 07:39:25 -07:00
2009-12-06 21:10:56 +01:00
2009-12-06 21:10:56 +01:00
2009-09-18 09:48:52 -07:00
2009-06-16 19:47:48 -07:00
2009-08-29 14:10:07 +02:00
2009-09-19 13:13:17 -07:00
2009-07-24 10:53:29 +02:00
2009-06-18 13:03:56 -07:00
2009-10-29 08:56:20 +10:30
2009-09-23 07:39:41 -07:00
2009-11-04 19:13:48 +01:00
2009-12-09 10:03:05 +01:00
2009-12-09 10:03:05 +01:00
2009-11-18 14:52:25 +01:00
2009-10-26 09:40:30 +01:00
2009-12-09 10:03:01 +01:00
2009-07-12 14:03:27 -07:00
2009-11-26 12:59:20 +01:00
2009-09-23 18:13:10 -07:00
2009-11-02 16:02:39 +01:00
2009-06-18 13:03:55 -07:00