e40cc4bdfd
Just like pkgtemp registers another core of the same package when one gets removed, coretemp should register another hyperthread (if available) in that situation. As pointed out in the patch fixing the respective code in pkgtemp, the list protectng mutex must be dropped before calling coretemp_device_add(), and due to the restructured loop (including an explicit return) the "safe" variant of the list iterator isn't needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Rudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>